Daily Scrum 02 — integration boundaries
Historical Sprint 1 evidence
This page preserves a reconstructed Sprint 1 coordination record. It is not a current status report; see the Scrum records overview for its evidence and inference boundaries.
| Field | Record |
|---|---|
| Reconstructed date | 10 August 2026 |
| Reporting window | 7–10 August 2026 |
| Sprint focus | Turn the separate foundations into an authenticated vertical slice |
| Evidence | Commits for Gitea Actions, Fastify, Auth0, event APIs, PostGIS eligibility, reported location, CORS, and Azure deployment |
This is an evidence-based reconstruction, not a transcript. The repository establishes the work completed during this reporting window but not the exact order or wording of a call.
Progress since the previous check-in
| Workstream | Evidence-backed update |
|---|---|
| Product/Web | Kevin completed the Auth0-aware Explore journey, connected reported-location claims to eligibility, added clear unavailable/denied states, and integrated the browser with the deployed API. |
| API/security | Tyron established the Fastify/Auth0 boundary, event and eligibility routes, exact-origin CORS policy, tests, and the initial Azure API deployment configuration. |
| Data | Uzair delivered the PostGIS eligibility service, database-backed event path, safe precision handling, migrations, and infrastructure support for the Azure deployment. |
| Quality/delivery | Caleb added the Gitea Actions workflow, separated quality jobs, proved the merge gate with a controlled failure/revert, and contributed the initial Azure Web/API deployment setup. |
Decisions reflected in the increment
- Auth0 was selected instead of implementing password authentication in the project.
/api/v1became the versioned browser-to-server boundary.- The API validates access tokens and makes eligibility decisions; the browser only submits intent and reported-location data.
- CI separates formatting, linting, type-checking, testing, and build feedback.
Impediments and uncertainty
- The integrated slice existed, but production database readiness, public documentation, and repeatable release evidence were incomplete.
- The reported-location flow still needed manual permission-denied, unavailable, responsive, and accessibility evidence.
- Gameplay work beyond discovery was not yet sliced into a dependency-aware delivery plan.
Plan before the next check-in
- Run the release checklist against the deployed discovery slice.
- Refine release-quality issues and distinguish automated gates from manual evidence.
- Resolve gameplay dependencies before starting the Basic-tier loop.
- Keep eligibility, challenge outcomes, rewards, and other protected state on the server.
AI declaration
This retrospective daily summary was generated with assistance from Codex[GPT-5] using repository history. It is not a verbatim meeting minute. The historical-status notice was added with assistance from Codex-CLI[GPT-5].